I ran the speed test and got a rating of 2.2, the lowest rating being the CPU at 2.2, the graphics rating wasn't far behind at 2.3.
Anyone else got a comparison?
I ran the speed test and got a rating of 2.2, the lowest rating being the CPU at 2.2, the graphics rating wasn't far behind at 2.3.
Anyone else got a comparison?
Mine has 2.2 for both graphics and processor. What version are you using?
HP mini 1035nr * Mac OSX 10.6 - RETIRED
HP Mini 311 UltimateION Edition- 320GB HD, 3GB RAM, Awesome paint job
I posted this on the W7 Installation Guide
In a relative sense, the 2.2 scores make sense.
http://i.gizmodo.com/5137488/windows-7- ... asurements
My HP Mini Blogger | ResNet Technician at UCSD | Mini 1030NR | Windows 7 RC1, OSx86.
My disk transfer rate is at 2.9. Do you know what can affect the numbers like that?
HP mini 1035nr * Mac OSX 10.6 - RETIRED
HP Mini 311 UltimateION Edition- 320GB HD, 3GB RAM, Awesome paint job
It probably has something to do with whether or not you had SSD (stock, runcore, mtron) or the HD (60GB)Originally Posted by intel9295
My HP Mini Blogger | ResNet Technician at UCSD | Mini 1030NR | Windows 7 RC1, OSx86.
Oh yeah that makes sense. I have the 60gb hard-drive.
HP mini 1035nr * Mac OSX 10.6 - RETIRED
HP Mini 311 UltimateION Edition- 320GB HD, 3GB RAM, Awesome paint job
Be glad you don't have the stock SSD your speed rating would be 2
HP Mini 1030NR, 2 GB Ram, 16GB SSD, Bluetooth(coming soon), 10.2" Screen, Windows 7
i'm getting 4.7 on my disk! How could that be? 16gb SSD + 2Gb ram.
Wow that is impressive. I'm surprised as the stock SSD is slow as molasses.
HP Mini 1035NR, 2 GB Ram, 60 GB HDD, Bluetooth, 10.2" Screen, Windows 7
hrm, run the test again. The whole Windows Experience Index benchmarks always give funny scores once in a while.Originally Posted by dgennetten
My HP Mini Blogger | ResNet Technician at UCSD | Mini 1030NR | Windows 7 RC1, OSx86.